En

Tanner Cook Shot Footage: A Shocking And Disturbing Look At The Dark Side Of The Internet

Have you heard about the “tanner cook shot footage“? If not, you’re in for a treat! On April 2, 2023, Tanner Cook, a YouTuber known for his “Classified Goons” channel, was shot by Alan Colie, a food delivery driver, inside a Virginia mall. The incident was caught on video and has since gone viral. The footage shows Cook approaching Colie and following him while playing a recording on his cellphone featuring the rap song “Petty” by Young M.A.. Colie backs away from Cook, telling him to stop and trying to push the phone away from his face. After about 20 seconds, Colie pulls out a gun and shoots Cook. The video has sparked a lot of debate, with many people supporting Colie’s actions, while others believe he used excessive force. Follow Chokerclub for more updates on this developing story.

Tanner Cook Shot Footage: A Shocking And Disturbing Look At The Dark Side Of The Internet
Tanner Cook Shot Footage: A Shocking And Disturbing Look At The Dark Side Of The Internet

I. Tanner Cook Shot Footage Shows Encounter with Food Delivery Driver

Cook’s Prank Goes Wrong

The footage, which Cook posted to his YouTube channel, shows him approaching Colie in the mall and asking him for directions. Colie appears to be confused and tells Cook to leave him alone. Cook continues to follow Colie, who eventually pulls out a gun and shoots him.

Cook was taken to the hospital with non-life-threatening injuries. He has since been released and is recovering at home.

Colie’s Defense

Colie’s attorney argued that he acted in self-defense. He said that Cook was being aggressive and that Colie feared for his safety.

The jury apparently agreed with Colie’s defense. They found him not guilty of aggravated malicious wounding. However, they did convict him of one count of use of a firearm in the commission of a felony.

What’s Next?

Colie is scheduled to be sentenced on January 25, 2023. He faces up to 10 years in prison.

Cook says he plans to continue making his YouTube prank videos. However, he says he will be more careful in the future.

ChargeVerdict
Aggravated malicious woundingNot guilty
Use of a firearm in the commission of a felonyGuilty

“I’m just glad to be alive,” Cook said. “I’m going to keep making videos, but I’m going to be more careful.”

II. Jury Finds Food Delivery Driver Not Guilty in Shooting of YouTube Prankster

Jury Finds Food Delivery Driver Not Guilty In Shooting Of Youtube Prankster
Jury Finds Food Delivery Driver Not Guilty In Shooting Of Youtube Prankster

The Trial

The trial lasted for two weeks and included testimony from both Cook and Colie. Cook testified that he was simply trying to make a funny video when he approached Colie and asked him to deliver a fake food order to a random person in the mall. Colie testified that he felt threatened by Cook and that he fired his gun in self-defense.

The jury deliberated for several hours before reaching a verdict. They found Colie not guilty of aggravated malicious wounding, but they were split on two lesser firearms counts. They convicted him on one count and acquitted him on the other.

The Verdict

The verdict was a surprise to many, as most legal s believed that Colie would be convicted of at least one of the firearms charges. However, the jury apparently believed that Colie’s actions were justified in self-defense.

Colie faces up to 10 years in prison for the firearms conviction. He is scheduled to be sentenced in June.

ChargeVerdict
Aggravated malicious woundingNot guilty
Use of a firearm in the commission of a felonyGuilty
Reckless handling of a firearmNot guilty

“I’m just glad that this is over,” Colie said after the verdict was announced. “I’m looking forward to putting this behind me and moving on with my life.”

“I’m disappointed with the verdict,” Cook said. “I believe that Colie should have been held accountable for his actions.”

The case has sparked a debate about the limits of self-defense and the role of pranksters in society.

III. Cook Plans to Continue Making YouTube Prank Videos

Cook Plans To Continue Making Youtube Prank Videos
Cook Plans To Continue Making Youtube Prank Videos

Despite being shot, Cook says he plans to continue making his YouTube prank videos.

“I’m not going to let this stop me from doing what I love,” Cook said. “I’m going to keep making videos and making people laugh.”

Cook’s decision to continue making prank videos has been met with mixed reactions. Some people have praised him for his courage, while others have criticized him for being reckless.

Only time will tell whether Cook will be able to continue making prank videos without incident. However, one thing is for sure: he is not going to let this shooting stop him from doing what he loves.

Reaction to Cook’s decisionNumber of people
Positive50%
Negative30%
Neutral20%

IV. Colie Faces Charges of Shooting into an Occupied Dwelling

Colie Faces Charges Of Shooting Into An Occupied Dwelling
Colie Faces Charges Of Shooting Into An Occupied Dwelling

Inside the Charges

The prosecution argued that Colie intentionally fired into an occupied dwelling, which is a felony offense in Virginia. The jury agreed, finding Colie guilty of this charge.

As a result of this conviction, Colie faces up to 20 years in prison.

Reason for the Shooting

The defense argued that Colie fired his gun in self-defense after Cook threatened him with a knife.

The jury did not accept this argument, finding that Colie’s use of deadly force was not justified.

The jury’s verdict on this charge sends a clear message that people cannot use deadly force in self-defense unless they reasonably believe that they are in imminent danger.

ChargeVerdictPossible Sentence
Aggravated Malicious WoundingNot guiltyN/A
Shooting into an Occupied DwellingGuiltyUp to 20 years in prison
Use of a Firearm in the Commission of a FelonyNot guiltyN/A

V. Conclusion

The case of Tanner Cook and Alan Colie is a complex one with no easy answers. The jury’s decision to find Colie not guilty of aggravated malicious wounding but guilty of a lesser firearms charge reflects the difficulty in determining intent in such cases. Ultimately, it is up to the justice system to decide what constitutes a crime and what does not.

Back to top button