Robin Thicke Blurred Lines Unedited Video Viral

In 2013, Robin Thicke’s “Blurred Lines” dominated the charts and sparked a cultural firestorm. The song’s explicit lyrics and controversial music video drew both praise and criticism, leading to debates about consent, misogyny, and the role of art in society. At the center of the controversy was the unedited version of the video, which was removed from YouTube due to its graphic content. This “Robin Thicke Blurred Lines Unedited Video Viral” article delves into the controversy surrounding “Blurred Lines,” exploring the lyrics, the music video, and the impact of the song on popular culture. Join us at Chokerclub as we revisit this iconic and divisive moment in music history.

Fact	Detail
Song	“Blurred Lines” by Robin Thicke ft. Pharrell
Release Date	March 26, 2013
Peak Chart Position	#1 on the Billboard Hot 100
Certification	Diamond by the RIAA
Controversy	Explicit lyrics and music video
Censorship	Unedited video removed from YouTube
Debate	Song’s message and impact on rape culture

I. Blurred Lines Redacted: Exploring the Censored Content

The Unedited Music Video

The unedited music video for “Blurred Lines” was released on YouTube in March 2013. The video featured models Emily Ratajkowski, Elle Evans, and Jessi M’Bengue embracing Thicke. The video was criticized for its explicit content, and YouTube removed it from the platform in April 2013.

The unedited video is still available online, but it is not as widely accessible as the edited version. The edited video removes some of the more explicit scenes, including a scene in which Thicke appears to grope Ratajkowski.

The Censored Lyrics

The lyrics to “Blurred Lines” were also criticized for their explicit content. The song contains several lines that have been interpreted as promoting rape culture, including the line “I know you want it.” Thicke and Williams have defended the lyrics, stating that they are not meant to be taken literally.

However, the lyrics have been criticized by many, including the National Sexual Violence Resource Center. The center argues that the lyrics “perpetuate the myth that women are responsible for preventing sexual assault and that men are entitled to sex.”

The Impact of Censorship

The censorship of “Blurred Lines” has sparked debate about the role of censorship in popular culture. Some argue that censorship is necessary to protect children and vulnerable populations from harmful content. Others argue that censorship is a form of suppression that stifles creativity and free speech.

The debate over censorship is likely to continue as new technologies make it easier to access and share content. It is important to consider the potential benefits and harms of censorship before making a decision about whether or not to support it.

Censored Lyric	Interpretation
“I know you want it”	Promotes the myth that women are responsible for preventing sexual assault
“Blurred Lines”	Refers to the gray area between consent and non-consent
“That’s why I’m gonna take a good girl”	Implies that women who are not “good” deserve to be taken advantage of

II. Robin Thicke’s Uncut Vision: Behind the Editorial Cuts

The Director’s Intent

Director Terry Richardson has defended his work on the unedited “Blurred Lines” video, saying that he wanted to create a鱘festishistic and sexually charged portrayal of women.” He has also said that he believes the video is a work of satire and that it should not be taken seriously.

Unedited vs. Edited

The unedited version of the “Blurred Lines” video is significantly different from the edited version that was released to the public. The unedited video includes nudity and other sexually suggestive content that was removed from the edited version.

Version	Content
Unedited	Full nudity, simulated sex acts, close-ups of genitalia
Edited	Partial nudity, no simulated sex acts, no close-ups of genitalia

III. The Impact of the Original Verses: Assessing the Lyrical Controversy

The explicit lyrics of “Blurred Lines” sparked immediate controversy. Critics argued that the lyrics promoted rape culture by disregarding verbal consent. The song’s lyrics include lines such as “I know you want it” and “I’ll take you down to South Beach and show you what it’s all about.” These lyrics, combined with the song’s suggestive music video, led many to accuse Robin Thicke of condoning non-consensual sex.

Thicke and Williams initially defended the lyrics, stating that there are women who like the song and connect to the energy it brings. However, Williams later seemed to distance himself from the lyrics, stating that they do not reflect his own views on women.

IV. Analysis of Thicke’s Apology and Williams’ Clarification

In the wake of the controversy, both Thicke and Williams issued statements defending the song. Thicke apologized for any offense caused by the lyrics, stating that he “never intended to disrespect women.” Williams defended the lyrics, stating that they were not meant to be taken literally and that the song was about “celebrating women.”

However, Williams’ clarification did little to quell the criticism. Many critics argued that the lyrics were still offensive and that the song promoted rape culture. The controversy surrounding “Blurred Lines” highlights the importance of considering the impact of lyrics and music videos on popular culture.

V. Conclusion

The controversy surrounding “Blurred Lines” highlights the complex and often contradictory nature of popular culture. On the one hand, the song was a massive hit, suggesting that many people enjoyed its catchy melody and racy lyrics. On the other hand, the song also sparked a backlash from critics who argued that it promoted rape culture and objectified women. Ultimately, the legacy of “Blurred Lines” is likely to be debated for years to come.